Former SEC Enforcement Attorney · 9 Years, SEC Division of Enforcement
Former SEC Enforcement Attorney

Nine Years InsideSEC Enforcement

Securities counsel for issuers who want filings reviewed the way the SEC staff reviews them.

Frederick M. Lehrer spent nine years in the SEC's Division of Enforcement — three of them concurrently as a Special Assistant U.S. Attorney — and has practiced securities and corporate finance law for more than 25 years, including advising overseas issuers on U.S. securities law.

Frederick M. Lehrer - International Securities Attorney
Frederick M. Lehrer
Attorney & Counselor at Law
9 Yrs
SEC Division of Enforcement
3 Yrs
Special Asst. U.S. Attorney
25+
Years in Private Practice
Flat Fee
Defined Scope, No Hourly Billing
About the Firm

International Securities Attorney
Frederick M. Lehrer

Frederick M. Lehrer advises U.S. and overseas issuers on U.S. securities law and has practiced in securities and corporate finance for more than 25 years. The practice covers going-public disclosures, SEC periodic reports, registration statements, private placement memoranda, mergers and acquisitions, Regulation A offerings, OTCQB and Pink quotations, and exchange listing applications.

Frederick Lehrer's clients have included a wide array of various industries, including entertainment, sports, cannabis, AI, real estate, hydration drinks, shipping, lending, telecommunications, animal nutrition, cryptocurrency, gaming, and electric vehicles.

★★
U.S. Army Veteran — 1967–1969
Army Commendation Medal · Vietnam Service Medal
Served as a Specialist 5. Duty, precision, and accountability under pressure — the foundation of every chapter of his career.
Read More About the Firm
Flat-Fee Monthly Scope

Monthly Securities Law Services

Ongoing work is handled under a monthly flat fee with a scope set in writing. No hourly billing and no separate charge for client calls within that scope.

SEC filings and disclosure (10-Q, 10-K, 8-K, Form D)
Press release and investor deck disclosure review
Agreement review (service, investment banking, securities purchase)
Corporate governance questions
Ongoing compliance support

Registration statements, private placement memoranda, and other large drafting projects are quoted separately on a flat-fee basis.

Schedule a Consultation
Securities Offerings

Capital Raising & Offering Compliance

When raising capital through public or private offerings, compliance with securities laws is critical to avoid severe penalties. Mr. Lehrer assists businesses with preparing and filing the necessary documentation and disclosure required by the SEC. These services are offered on a flat-fee basis with negotiated installment payments.

Why Choose Frederick M. Lehrer?

Quality Legal Solutions, Tailored for You

Finance-Oriented Mindset
Attorney Lehrer understands the financial challenges his clients face. He offers affordable, flat monthly securities law fee and registration statement fee arrangements to ensure high-quality representation without unexpected costs.
Hands-On Approach
From your initial consultation to resolution, Attorney Lehrer is directly involved in every step of your securities law matters, helping you explore all potential legal options.
25+ Years of Experience
More than twenty-five years of securities and corporate practice, applied to complex disclosure, offering, and transactional matters.
Your Partner in Corporate Finance
Frederick M. Lehrer is your trusted partner in corporate financial matters, providing strategic advice including structuring deals, navigating negotiations, and mitigating risks.
Transparent Pricing

Flat Fee Arrangements with a Defined Scope

Ongoing securities work is billed as a monthly flat fee against a written scope of services. Larger projects — a registration statement or private placement memorandum, for example — are quoted separately, also on a flat-fee basis.

No hourly rates
Scope agreed in writing before work begins
Calls and questions within scope carry no separate charge
No referral fees to other law firms
Schedule a Consultation

"Attorney Lehrer is directly involved in every step of your securities law matters, helping you explore all potential legal options."

— Frederick M. Lehrer, P.A.
Client Testimonials

Trusted by Executives & Public Companies

5.0out of 5
Based on 4 client reviews
5
4
4
0
3
0

A rare combination of speed, precision, and strategic judgment—Frederick M. Lehrer is our counsel for securities and transactional work.

C
CEO, Public Company
Public Company Client

A thoughtful advisor in complex transactions. His SEC disclosure work is detailed, and the turnaround has consistently met our deadlines.

C
CFO, Publicly Traded Corporation
Public Company Client

When timing and accuracy matter, he delivers—his command of SEC regulations and transactional detail is a real advantage for us.

GC
General Counsel
Public Company Client

For nearly a decade, we've relied on Frederick M. Lehrer for corporate securities and regulatory compliance work, accurate turnaround, and a steady hand on high-value corporate finance matters.

MD
Managing Director
Long-Term Client

Comments from clients of the firm, used with permission. Each matter is different; prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome in any other matter.

Schedule a Consultation
The Podcast

Inside Securities Law with Frederick M. Lehrer

Perspective from inside the SEC — translated for issuers, boards, and counsel.

All Episodes
EP 16August 19, 2026 · 3:42

The Reporting Calendar: 10-K, 10-Q, and the Four-Day 8-K

The day your registration statement goes effective, a clock starts, and it does not stop. This is the part of going public that founders underestimate most consistently. Three filings define the rhythm. The Form 10-K is the annual report. Audited financial statements, a full business description, risk factors, management's discussion and analysis, executive compensation, and management's assessment of internal control over financial reporting. The deadline depends on your filer status. Large accelerated filers have sixty days after fiscal year end. Accelerated filers have seventy-five. Non-accelerated filers — which is most companies that have recently gone public — have ninety. The Form 10-Q is the quarterly report for the first three quarters. Unaudited financials, updated MD&A, updated risk factors, legal proceedings. Forty days for accelerated and large accelerated filers, forty-five for everyone else. The Form 8-K is the one that catches companies off guard. It reports material events, and it is generally due within four business days of the event. Not four weeks. Four business days. Entry into a material agreement. Termination of one. A completed acquisition. Bankruptcy. A delisting notice. Departure or election of a director or principal officer. A change in auditor. A determination that previously issued financial statements should no longer be relied upon. That last one — the non-reliance item — is the item that most often precedes a staff inquiry. Here is what I want to convey. The 10-K and the 10-Q are scheduled. You can staff for them. The 8-K is unscheduled, and it requires that someone inside the company recognizes an event as reportable in real time, on a four-day fuse, usually while that same event is consuming everyone's attention. The failure mode is almost never a company deciding to hide something. It is a company that had no process for noticing. A CFO negotiates a material contract on a Thursday and does not think of it as a filing event until the following week. Build the process before you need it. A short written list of trigger events, kept where the finance and legal teams will actually see it. One person who owns the calendar. And a standing instruction that anything ambiguous gets a phone call to counsel the same day, not after the deal closes. One more point. Risk factors are not boilerplate you write once and copy forward. A risk factor section identical to last year's, in a year when the business changed materially, invites a comment letter. Missed filings compound. A late 10-K can jeopardize shelf registration eligibility and Rule 144 availability for your shareholders, and it is visible to everyone who looks. This is Inside Securities Law. I'm Frederick M. Lehrer. General information, not legal advice. ]]>

Listen
EP 13August 17, 2026 · 4:57

Going Public Is the Beginning: What Happens After SEC Effectiveness

Going Public Is the Beginning: What Happens After SEC Effectiveness Becoming public is often treated as the finish line. In reality, SEC effectiveness and the beginning of trading mark the start of a new legal and operational system. In this episode of Inside Securities Law , securities attorney and former SEC enforcement attorney Frederick M. Lehrer explains the continuing responsibilities a company assumes after going public. Public companies must file periodic reports, disclose material events, maintain disclosure controls, manage insider-trading risks, and ensure that statements remain consistent across filings, interviews, earnings calls, presentations, social media, and investor communications. Topics include: Continuing SEC reporting obligations Forms 10-K and 10-Q Identifying and escalating material information Disclosure controls and procedures Tracking material contracts and related-party transactions Updating risk factors and management discussions Board and accounting documentation Evaluating cybersecurity incidents Insider-trading policies, trading windows, and preclearance Assigning responsibility for disclosure decisions The ongoing organizational cost of operating as a public company Material information can originate anywhere within an organization, including finance, operations, sales, litigation, cybersecurity, human resources, regulatory affairs, or a subsidiary. Effective compliance requires a system that moves important information from the operating level to those responsible for evaluating materiality and preparing disclosures. Periodic reports should not be reconstructed from scratch near each filing deadline. Companies should maintain an ongoing disclosure record, document material developments as they occur, and clearly establish who identifies, evaluates, drafts, reviews, and approves public disclosures. The central lesson: a company does not become public merely by completing a transaction. It becomes public by building the systems necessary to communicate accurately, consistently, and on time. This podcast is provided for general educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Learn more: SecuritiesAttorney1.com Host Bio Frederick M. Lehrer is a securities attorney and former enforcement attorney with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. He advises companies on going-public transactions, SEC registration statements, periodic reporting, corporate disclosure, Regulation A offerings, private placements, and SEC comment letters. Drawing on his experience inside the SEC and more than two decades in private practice, Lehrer helps issuers prepare securities filings and establish compliance processes informed by how regulators evaluate disclosure, materiality, risk, and investor protection. He hosts Inside Securities Law with Frederick M. Lehrer , an educational podcast examining the legal and regulatory responsibilities companies face when raising capital, becoming public, communicating with investors, and operating within the federal securities-law framework. ]]>

Listen
EP 15August 02, 2026 · 4:44

The Real Risk of Overpromising in a Securities Offering

Companies raising capital have every reason to explain their strengths, market opportunities, management experience, and growth potential. The legal risk begins when optimism is presented as certainty. In this episode of Inside Securities Law , securities attorney and former SEC enforcement attorney Frederick M. Lehrer explains how aggressive promotional language can create material disclosure problems in private placements, Regulation A offerings, and registered securities offerings. A statement does not need to be completely false to be misleading. A technically accurate statement may still create an inaccurate impression when important context or qualifying information is omitted. Topics include: When legitimate optimism becomes a disclosure risk Technically true statements that create misleading impressions Describing preliminary discussions as probable contracts Claims about product readiness and commercialization Revenue projections without a reasonable factual basis Why disclaimers cannot cure unsupported predictions The limits of generic risk-factor language Distinguishing facts, expectations, objectives, and possibilities Words such as “guaranteed,” “proven,” “secured,” and “committed” Reusing promotional language in securities offering documents Evaluating whether significant claims can be supported later Strong offering documents distinguish between what exists today, what management reasonably expects, what the company intends to pursue, and what remains merely possible. Those categories should not be blended together or expressed with language that turns uncertainty into an implied promise. Before making a significant investor-facing claim, management should ask: What evidence supports the statement? What information would materially qualify it? How would the statement appear if later reviewed by the SEC, a court, or an investor who lost money? Good disclosure is not written only for the day an offering closes. It must remain defensible after a missed projection, delayed product launch, failed transaction, or liquidity problem. The objective is not to make the company sound less compelling. It is to communicate the opportunity accurately without converting uncertainty into certainty. This podcast is provided for general educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Learn more: SecuritiesAttorney1.com Host Bio Frederick M. Lehrer is a securities attorney and former enforcement attorney with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. He advises companies on securities offerings, private placements, Regulation A, going-public transactions, SEC registration statements, periodic reporting, disclosure compliance, and SEC comment letters. Drawing on his experience inside the SEC and more than two decades in private practice, Lehrer helps issuers prepare accurate, defensible securities disclosures informed by how regulators evaluate material statements, omissions, risk, and investor protection. He hosts Inside Securities Law with Frederick M. Lehrer , an educational podcast examining the legal and regulatory responsibilities companies face when raising capital, making disclosures, communicating with investors, and operating within the federal securities-law framework. ]]>

Listen
Free Download

Going Public Checklist

A comprehensive 6-phase guide covering every legal, regulatory, and financial step required to take a company public — from pre-IPO corporate readiness through ongoing SEC reporting obligations. Free to download.

Pre-IPO corporate structure & governance
S-1 vs Reg A+ vs Reverse Merger comparison
SEC registration & comment process
Ongoing reporting obligations (10-K, 10-Q, 8-K)
5-Page PDF • Free

Going Public Checklist

Prepared by Frederick M. Lehrer — Former SEC Enforcement Attorney

Download Free Checklist
The Firm's Perspective

What Twenty-Five Years of Securities Practice

Actually Looks Like

"Most securities attorneys read the regulations. I spent nine years enforcing them. When I review a client's S-1 or Regulation D offering, I am not consulting a checklist — I am running the same analytical framework I used at the SEC's Southeast Regional Office to evaluate whether a filing would attract scrutiny, generate a comment letter, or escalate into a formal investigation."

— Frederick M. Lehrer, Former SEC Enforcement Attorney

The Enforcement Background That Changes the Advice

From 1991 through 2000, Frederick M. Lehrer served as an attorney in the Division of Enforcement at the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission's Southeast Regional Office. During those nine years, he participated in investigations involving insider trading, accounting fraud, market manipulation, misleading disclosures, and failures to file required reports under federal securities law. He was not a compliance officer reviewing policies — he was building cases.

From 1997 through 1999, he served concurrently as a Special Assistant United States Attorney in the Southern District of Florida, prosecuting securities-related financial crimes. That dual civil-and-criminal enforcement experience — understanding both how the SEC builds a civil enforcement action and how the DOJ constructs a criminal prosecution — is not something that can be acquired from a textbook or a continuing legal education seminar.

When that background is applied to private practice, the result is advisory work that is fundamentally different from what a securities attorney without enforcement experience can offer. The firm evaluates every disclosure, every registration statement, and every investor communication from the perspective of how the SEC staff would analyze it — because that is exactly how the firm's principal was trained to analyze documents.

Issuer-Side Representation: What the Practice Actually Covers

The firm's practice focuses on issuer-side representation. This means the firm represents companies — not investors, not regulators, not plaintiffs' class action counsel. The firm's clients are issuers preparing to access public capital markets, companies managing ongoing disclosure obligations under the Securities Act of 1933 and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and private companies conducting capital raises through exempt offerings under Regulation D.

Engagements typically involve preparing and reviewing SEC filings — Forms 10-K, 10-Q, and 8-K — drafting and revising registration statements such as Form S-1 and Form 10, advising on Regulation A offerings, and assisting companies conducting capital raises through Regulation D private placements. Many clients are companies preparing to go public or transitioning from private capital raising into public market reporting obligations.

Others are established reporting companies requiring ongoing securities counsel to review disclosures, evaluate investor communications, and address SEC comment letters. The firm also advises companies operating in industries subject to heightened regulatory scrutiny — cannabis and CBD companies navigating federal illegality disclosures, artificial intelligence companies describing rapidly evolving technologies to investors, and cryptocurrency or digital asset issuers evaluating whether a token or digital instrument may constitute a security under the Howey test.

On Disclosure Precision

Why Boilerplate Risk Factors Are No Longer Sufficient

In industries subject to heightened regulatory scrutiny, disclosure precision is critical. Boilerplate risk factors — the kind that say "we operate in a heavily regulated industry and changes in law could adversely affect our business" — are often insufficient when regulators expect detailed explanations of operational risk, legal uncertainty, and compliance frameworks.

A cannabis company that discloses federal illegality in a single generic paragraph is not adequately disclosing the specific operational risks that flow from that illegality — banking access, interstate commerce limitations, Schedule I classification implications for employees, and the risk that federal enforcement priorities could shift. An artificial intelligence company that describes its technology in aspirational terms without disclosing the specific risks of model failure, regulatory classification, or data privacy liability is creating exactly the kind of disclosure gap that generates SEC comment letters.

The firm's approach to disclosure review is shaped by enforcement experience. When reviewing registration statements, periodic reports, or investor communications, filings are evaluated from the perspective of how the SEC staff might analyze the document. This perspective allows potential disclosure deficiencies to be addressed before they become the subject of regulatory inquiries or comment letters — and long before they become the basis for an enforcement action.

1984 – 2000

U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Sixteen years at the Commission — first as an investigator, then nine years as an enforcement attorney in the Southeast Regional Office — working insider trading, accounting fraud, market manipulation, misleading disclosures, and reporting failures. Built cases. Evaluated filings. Understood how enforcement actions begin.

1997 – 1999

Special Assistant U.S. Attorney

Concurrent appointment in the Southern District of Florida prosecuting securities-related financial crimes. The dual civil-and-criminal enforcement perspective — understanding both how the SEC builds a civil action and how the DOJ constructs a criminal prosecution — is the foundation of the firm's risk analysis today.

2000 – Present

Private Practice

More than twenty-five years advising issuers worldwide on SEC registration, disclosure obligations, Regulation D private placements, Regulation A offerings, going public transactions, and ongoing reporting compliance. Flat-fee structure designed to remove the hesitation companies feel when seeking early legal guidance.

Flat-Fee Structure

Compliance Support Model

This firm utilizes a flat-fee structure for both ongoing compliance advisory and specific project-based engagements. This approach is designed to provide clients with predictable legal costs, allowing for a defined budgetary framework when managing regulatory requirements.

By utilizing a fixed-fee model, the firm aims to facilitate an environment where communication regarding securities guidance is frequent and proactive. This structure is intended to support the primary goal shared by both the firm and the client: the production of accurate, complete, and defensible disclosures.

Industries the Firm Regularly Advises

The firm's clients span a wide range of industries, including entertainment, sports, cannabis and CBD, artificial intelligence, real estate, hydration and consumer products, shipping, lending, telecommunications, animal nutrition, cryptocurrency and digital assets, gaming, and electric vehicles. What these industries share is not their business model — it is their need for securities counsel who understands how their specific operational characteristics translate into disclosure obligations, and how those disclosures will be evaluated by the SEC staff.

Cannabis & CBD
Artificial Intelligence
Cryptocurrency & Digital Assets
Electric Vehicles
Real Estate
Entertainment & Sports
Telecommunications
Financial Services

The firm is based in Florida and serves clients internationally. Consultations are confidential and available by phone, video, or in person.

Frequently Asked Questions

Common Questions About

Securities Law & Our Services

Ongoing securities work is handled under a monthly flat fee covering a defined scope: SEC periodic filings (10-K, 10-Q, 8-K, Form D), disclosure and press-release review, agreement review, and governance questions. Registration statements, private placement memoranda, and other large drafting projects are quoted separately on a flat-fee basis. No hourly billing, and the scope is set in writing before work begins.

Before entering private practice, Mr. Lehrer spent nine years as an enforcement attorney in the SEC's Division of Enforcement, investigating and prosecuting fraudulent schemes and other violations of federal securities laws. During three of those years he served concurrently as a Special Assistant United States Attorney in the Southern District of Florida.

Yes. Frederick M. Lehrer, Attorney and Counselor at Law, is a national and international law practice that focuses on securities and corporate law matters. He serves clients worldwide from his office in Clermont, Florida, handling cross-border offerings, foreign private issuers, and international compliance matters.

Frederick M. Lehrer offers comprehensive securities law services including SEC disclosure and reporting, SEC registration statements, going public matters, private placement memoranda, OTC market filings, proxy statements, insider reports, private exemptions, Blue Sky compliance, investor relations compliance, and Rule 506 compliance.

Frederick M. Lehrer assists companies in going public through multiple paths including traditional IPOs (Form S-1), Regulation A+ offerings, direct public offerings, reverse mergers, and OTC market listings. He handles all SEC filings, FINRA applications, and Blue Sky compliance from start to finish.

Frederick M. Lehrer offers flat-fee arrangements for most securities law services, providing transparent, predictable pricing. Clients pay a monthly flat fee for ongoing legal services, with registration statements and large document preparation also offered on a flat fee basis — making budgeting straightforward for startups and established companies alike.

Frederick M. Lehrer spent nine years as an enforcement attorney in the SEC's Division of Enforcement, where he investigated and prosecuted fraudulent schemes and violations of federal securities laws. During three of those years he served concurrently as a Special Assistant United States Attorney in the Southern District of Florida, giving him unique insight into how regulators think and act.

Have a question not listed here? Contact us for a free consultation.

Ask Frederick M. Lehrer
Email Fred Directly(561) 706-7646