International Securities Attorney
Frederick M. Lehrer
Frederick M. Lehrer advises U.S. and overseas issuers on U.S. securities law and has practiced in securities and corporate finance for more than 25 years. The practice covers going-public disclosures, SEC periodic reports, registration statements, private placement memoranda, mergers and acquisitions, Regulation A offerings, OTCQB and Pink quotations, and exchange listing applications.
Frederick Lehrer's clients have included a wide array of various industries, including entertainment, sports, cannabis, AI, real estate, hydration drinks, shipping, lending, telecommunications, animal nutrition, cryptocurrency, gaming, and electric vehicles.
Monthly Securities Law Services
Ongoing work is handled under a monthly flat fee with a scope set in writing. No hourly billing and no separate charge for client calls within that scope.
Registration statements, private placement memoranda, and other large drafting projects are quoted separately on a flat-fee basis.
Schedule a ConsultationCapital Raising & Offering Compliance
When raising capital through public or private offerings, compliance with securities laws is critical to avoid severe penalties. Mr. Lehrer assists businesses with preparing and filing the necessary documentation and disclosure required by the SEC. These services are offered on a flat-fee basis with negotiated installment payments.
Quality Legal Solutions, Tailored for You
Issuer-Side Securities Counsel
Every engagement begins with one question: what does the SEC expect, and what are the consequences of falling short?
Securities Law
SEC disclosure and reporting for public companies — 10-K, 10-Q, 8-K, and registration statements.
Going Public Law
Counsel for companies going public by S-1, Form 10, Regulation A+, or direct public offering.
Corporate Law
M&A, private placements, board governance, and transactional documentation.
Additional Securities Services
Proxy statements, reverse merger reviews, Super 8-K filings, and market listing applications.
Flat Fee Arrangements with a Defined Scope
Ongoing securities work is billed as a monthly flat fee against a written scope of services. Larger projects — a registration statement or private placement memorandum, for example — are quoted separately, also on a flat-fee basis.
"Attorney Lehrer is directly involved in every step of your securities law matters, helping you explore all potential legal options."
— Frederick M. Lehrer, P.A.
Trusted by Executives & Public Companies
“A rare combination of speed, precision, and strategic judgment—Frederick M. Lehrer is our counsel for securities and transactional work.”
“A thoughtful advisor in complex transactions. His SEC disclosure work is detailed, and the turnaround has consistently met our deadlines.”
“When timing and accuracy matter, he delivers—his command of SEC regulations and transactional detail is a real advantage for us.”
“For nearly a decade, we've relied on Frederick M. Lehrer for corporate securities and regulatory compliance work, accurate turnaround, and a steady hand on high-value corporate finance matters.”
Comments from clients of the firm, used with permission. Each matter is different; prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome in any other matter.
Schedule a ConsultationInside Securities Law with Frederick M. Lehrer
Perspective from inside the SEC — translated for issuers, boards, and counsel.
Recent Articles
Going Public Checklist
A comprehensive 6-phase guide covering every legal, regulatory, and financial step required to take a company public — from pre-IPO corporate readiness through ongoing SEC reporting obligations. Free to download.
What Twenty-Five Years of Securities Practice
Actually Looks Like
"Most securities attorneys read the regulations. I spent nine years enforcing them. When I review a client's S-1 or Regulation D offering, I am not consulting a checklist — I am running the same analytical framework I used at the SEC's Southeast Regional Office to evaluate whether a filing would attract scrutiny, generate a comment letter, or escalate into a formal investigation."
The Enforcement Background That Changes the Advice
From 1991 through 2000, Frederick M. Lehrer served as an attorney in the Division of Enforcement at the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission's Southeast Regional Office. During those nine years, he participated in investigations involving insider trading, accounting fraud, market manipulation, misleading disclosures, and failures to file required reports under federal securities law. He was not a compliance officer reviewing policies — he was building cases.
From 1997 through 1999, he served concurrently as a Special Assistant United States Attorney in the Southern District of Florida, prosecuting securities-related financial crimes. That dual civil-and-criminal enforcement experience — understanding both how the SEC builds a civil enforcement action and how the DOJ constructs a criminal prosecution — is not something that can be acquired from a textbook or a continuing legal education seminar.
When that background is applied to private practice, the result is advisory work that is fundamentally different from what a securities attorney without enforcement experience can offer. The firm evaluates every disclosure, every registration statement, and every investor communication from the perspective of how the SEC staff would analyze it — because that is exactly how the firm's principal was trained to analyze documents.
Issuer-Side Representation: What the Practice Actually Covers
The firm's practice focuses on issuer-side representation. This means the firm represents companies — not investors, not regulators, not plaintiffs' class action counsel. The firm's clients are issuers preparing to access public capital markets, companies managing ongoing disclosure obligations under the Securities Act of 1933 and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and private companies conducting capital raises through exempt offerings under Regulation D.
Engagements typically involve preparing and reviewing SEC filings — Forms 10-K, 10-Q, and 8-K — drafting and revising registration statements such as Form S-1 and Form 10, advising on Regulation A offerings, and assisting companies conducting capital raises through Regulation D private placements. Many clients are companies preparing to go public or transitioning from private capital raising into public market reporting obligations.
Others are established reporting companies requiring ongoing securities counsel to review disclosures, evaluate investor communications, and address SEC comment letters. The firm also advises companies operating in industries subject to heightened regulatory scrutiny — cannabis and CBD companies navigating federal illegality disclosures, artificial intelligence companies describing rapidly evolving technologies to investors, and cryptocurrency or digital asset issuers evaluating whether a token or digital instrument may constitute a security under the Howey test.
Why Boilerplate Risk Factors Are No Longer Sufficient
In industries subject to heightened regulatory scrutiny, disclosure precision is critical. Boilerplate risk factors — the kind that say "we operate in a heavily regulated industry and changes in law could adversely affect our business" — are often insufficient when regulators expect detailed explanations of operational risk, legal uncertainty, and compliance frameworks.
A cannabis company that discloses federal illegality in a single generic paragraph is not adequately disclosing the specific operational risks that flow from that illegality — banking access, interstate commerce limitations, Schedule I classification implications for employees, and the risk that federal enforcement priorities could shift. An artificial intelligence company that describes its technology in aspirational terms without disclosing the specific risks of model failure, regulatory classification, or data privacy liability is creating exactly the kind of disclosure gap that generates SEC comment letters.
The firm's approach to disclosure review is shaped by enforcement experience. When reviewing registration statements, periodic reports, or investor communications, filings are evaluated from the perspective of how the SEC staff might analyze the document. This perspective allows potential disclosure deficiencies to be addressed before they become the subject of regulatory inquiries or comment letters — and long before they become the basis for an enforcement action.
Compliance Support Model
This firm utilizes a flat-fee structure for both ongoing compliance advisory and specific project-based engagements. This approach is designed to provide clients with predictable legal costs, allowing for a defined budgetary framework when managing regulatory requirements.
By utilizing a fixed-fee model, the firm aims to facilitate an environment where communication regarding securities guidance is frequent and proactive. This structure is intended to support the primary goal shared by both the firm and the client: the production of accurate, complete, and defensible disclosures.
Industries the Firm Regularly Advises
The firm's clients span a wide range of industries, including entertainment, sports, cannabis and CBD, artificial intelligence, real estate, hydration and consumer products, shipping, lending, telecommunications, animal nutrition, cryptocurrency and digital assets, gaming, and electric vehicles. What these industries share is not their business model — it is their need for securities counsel who understands how their specific operational characteristics translate into disclosure obligations, and how those disclosures will be evaluated by the SEC staff.
The firm is based in Florida and serves clients internationally. Consultations are confidential and available by phone, video, or in person.
Common Questions About
Securities Law & Our Services
Have a question not listed here? Contact us for a free consultation.
Ask Frederick M. Lehrer