Former SEC Enforcement Attorney · 9 Years, SEC Division of Enforcement
Former SEC Enforcement Attorney

Nine Years InsideSEC Enforcement

Securities counsel for issuers who want filings reviewed the way the SEC staff reviews them.

Frederick M. Lehrer spent nine years in the SEC's Division of Enforcement — three of them concurrently as a Special Assistant U.S. Attorney — and has practiced securities and corporate finance law for more than 25 years, including advising overseas issuers on U.S. securities law.

Frederick M. Lehrer - International Securities Attorney
Frederick M. Lehrer
Attorney & Counselor at Law
9 Yrs
SEC Division of Enforcement
3 Yrs
Special Asst. U.S. Attorney
25+
Years in Private Practice
Flat Fee
Defined Scope, No Hourly Billing
About the Firm

International Securities Attorney
Frederick M. Lehrer

Frederick M. Lehrer advises U.S. and overseas issuers on U.S. securities law and has practiced in securities and corporate finance for more than 25 years. The practice covers going-public disclosures, SEC periodic reports, registration statements, private placement memoranda, mergers and acquisitions, Regulation A offerings, OTCQB and Pink quotations, and exchange listing applications.

Frederick Lehrer's clients have included a wide array of various industries, including entertainment, sports, cannabis, AI, real estate, hydration drinks, shipping, lending, telecommunications, animal nutrition, cryptocurrency, gaming, and electric vehicles.

★★
U.S. Army Veteran — 1967–1969
Army Commendation Medal · Vietnam Service Medal
Served as a Specialist 5. Duty, precision, and accountability under pressure — the foundation of every chapter of his career.
Read More About the Firm
Flat-Fee Monthly Scope

Monthly Securities Law Services

Ongoing work is handled under a monthly flat fee with a scope set in writing. No hourly billing and no separate charge for client calls within that scope.

SEC filings and disclosure (10-Q, 10-K, 8-K, Form D)
Press release and investor deck disclosure review
Agreement review (service, investment banking, securities purchase)
Corporate governance questions
Ongoing compliance support

Registration statements, private placement memoranda, and other large drafting projects are quoted separately on a flat-fee basis.

Schedule a Consultation
Securities Offerings

Capital Raising & Offering Compliance

When raising capital through public or private offerings, compliance with securities laws is critical to avoid severe penalties. Mr. Lehrer assists businesses with preparing and filing the necessary documentation and disclosure required by the SEC. These services are offered on a flat-fee basis with negotiated installment payments.

Why Choose Frederick M. Lehrer?

Quality Legal Solutions, Tailored for You

Finance-Oriented Mindset
Attorney Lehrer understands the financial challenges his clients face. He offers affordable, flat monthly securities law fee and registration statement fee arrangements to ensure high-quality representation without unexpected costs.
Hands-On Approach
From your initial consultation to resolution, Attorney Lehrer is directly involved in every step of your securities law matters, helping you explore all potential legal options.
25+ Years of Experience
More than twenty-five years of securities and corporate practice, applied to complex disclosure, offering, and transactional matters.
Your Partner in Corporate Finance
Frederick M. Lehrer is your trusted partner in corporate financial matters, providing strategic advice including structuring deals, navigating negotiations, and mitigating risks.
Transparent Pricing

Flat Fee Arrangements with a Defined Scope

Ongoing securities work is billed as a monthly flat fee against a written scope of services. Larger projects — a registration statement or private placement memorandum, for example — are quoted separately, also on a flat-fee basis.

No hourly rates
Scope agreed in writing before work begins
Calls and questions within scope carry no separate charge
No referral fees to other law firms
Schedule a Consultation

"Attorney Lehrer is directly involved in every step of your securities law matters, helping you explore all potential legal options."

— Frederick M. Lehrer, P.A.
Client Testimonials

Trusted by Executives & Public Companies

5.0out of 5
Based on 4 client reviews
5
4
4
0
3
0

A rare combination of speed, precision, and strategic judgment—Frederick M. Lehrer is our counsel for securities and transactional work.

C
CEO, Public Company
Public Company Client

A thoughtful advisor in complex transactions. His SEC disclosure work is detailed, and the turnaround has consistently met our deadlines.

C
CFO, Publicly Traded Corporation
Public Company Client

When timing and accuracy matter, he delivers—his command of SEC regulations and transactional detail is a real advantage for us.

GC
General Counsel
Public Company Client

For nearly a decade, we've relied on Frederick M. Lehrer for corporate securities and regulatory compliance work, accurate turnaround, and a steady hand on high-value corporate finance matters.

MD
Managing Director
Long-Term Client

Comments from clients of the firm, used with permission. Each matter is different; prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome in any other matter.

Schedule a Consultation
The Podcast

Inside Securities Law with Frederick M. Lehrer

Perspective from inside the SEC — translated for issuers, boards, and counsel.

All Episodes
EP 23September 5, 2026 · 2:52

Why I Bill a Flat Fee

I want to spend this episode on something that is not a rule or a form. How legal work gets priced, and why I do it the way I do. I bill flat fees. For a defined scope of work, the fee is agreed in writing before the work begins, and it does not change because the work took longer than I expected. For ongoing securities and corporate work, I offer a monthly flat fee covering unlimited services within that scope. The reason is not marketing. It is about what a meter does to a relationship. When every phone call has a price, a client who is uncertain whether something is a reportable event has a financial reason not to call. And the calls that do not happen are, in my experience, the expensive ones. The 8-K that got filed late. The press release that went out before anyone read it. The investor who was introduced by a finder, and nobody asked how the finder was being paid. Every one of those is a situation where a five-minute conversation would have cost nothing to have and a great deal to skip. I spent nine years in the SEC's Division of Enforcement. I have seen what these matters look like from the other side of the table, after they have gone wrong. Almost none of them started with someone deciding to break the law. They started with someone deciding not to ask. A flat fee removes the meter. Call me. Ask the question that seems too small to ask. That is the entire point of the arrangement. There is a second reason, which is simple honesty about cost. A registration statement is a definable piece of work. I have drafted a great many of them. I know approximately what it takes. A client deciding whether to go public is making a capital allocation decision, and they cannot make it well against an estimate that might double. Flat fee means the number in the engagement letter is the number. What a flat fee does not mean: it does not mean cheap, and it does not mean unlimited scope. The scope is written down. If the matter changes materially — a new transaction, an investigation, something nobody anticipated — we scope that separately and price it separately, in writing, before it starts. If you want to know what a matter would cost, the way to find out is a conversation. No intake form. No queue. You reach me directly. This is Inside Securities Law. I'm Frederick M. Lehrer. General information, not legal advice.

Listen
EP 21September 7, 2026 · 3:34

OTC Markets and Form 211: How a Ticker Actually Happens

Becoming a reporting company and having a stock that trades are two different things. Companies conflate them constantly. SEC registration makes you a reporting company. It does not create a market. No investor can buy your shares until a broker-dealer is willing to quote them, and that path runs through FINRA. Here is the sequence. A market maker — a registered broker-dealer — agrees to sponsor your quotation. You do not apply to FINRA yourself. The market maker files Form 211 on your behalf. That form asks FINRA to permit the broker-dealer to publish quotations in your security. FINRA reviews it under its own rules and under Exchange Act Rule 15c2-11. Since the amendments to 15c2-11 took effect, that standard is materially higher than it used to be. Current information about the issuer must be publicly available, and it must stay available. A company that goes dark loses quotation eligibility, and its shares move to the expert market, where retail investors generally cannot buy them. What goes into that submission is substantial: organizational documents, a capitalization table showing how each block of shares was issued and under what exemption, financial statements, and officer and director background. Then there are the OTC Markets tiers, which are separate from FINRA entirely, and which were restructured in 2025. OTCQX sits at the top with the most demanding standards. OTCQB is the venture tier. Below that is OTCID Basic, which replaced what most people still call Pink Current, and then Pink Limited and the Expert Market. For OTCQB specifically, know the current criteria. Current reporting. Annual financials audited by a PCAOB-registered firm. A minimum bid price of five cents for the thirty days before admission, and above one cent to stay in. A public float of at least ten percent, at least fifty beneficial shareholders, and no bankruptcy. Two practical points. First, finding a market maker willing to sponsor a Form 211 is often the hardest step, and it has nothing to do with law. It is a business decision by the broker-dealer. Companies are frequently surprised by this. Counsel can prepare a complete and clean information package, but no lawyer can compel a market maker to file. Second, the timeline is unpredictable. Comments come back. Information gets requested. Plan in months, not weeks, and do not promise your shareholders a date. I handle the Form 211 information package, the OTC Markets application, and the ongoing disclosure that keeps a quotation alive. What nobody can do is guarantee that a symbol appears on a schedule. Anyone who tells you otherwise is selling something. This is Inside Securities Law. I'm Frederick M. Lehrer. General information, not legal advice.

Listen
EP 19September 2, 2026 · 3:53

Rule 506(b) and 506(c): The Line You Cannot Uncross

Rule 506 of Regulation D is the most used exemption in American capital formation and the most frequently broken. Most of the breakage happens at one line: general solicitation. There are two flavors. 506(b) and 506(c). Under 506(b) you may sell to an unlimited number of accredited investors and up to thirty-five non-accredited investors, provided those non-accredited investors are financially sophisticated and receive specified disclosure. There is no dollar limit. You may generally rely on an investor's written representation that they are accredited, absent facts suggesting otherwise. What you may not do is generally solicit. No advertising. No public posting. No pitching a room of strangers. Under 506(c) you may generally solicit all you want. Advertise it. Post it online. Speak about it at a conference. The trade is that every purchaser must actually be accredited, and you must take reasonable steps to verify it. A checked box is not verification. Tax returns, brokerage statements, or a written confirmation from a licensed attorney, CPA, or registered broker-dealer — those are verification. Here is where issuers get into trouble. They start under 506(b), because that is what counsel advised. Then the CEO posts about the raise on LinkedIn. Or the company emails the deck to a purchased list. Or a founder describes the terms on a podcast. That is general solicitation, and it does not convert the offering into a 506(c) offering. It jeopardizes the 506(b) exemption, because verification was never performed on the investors who already came in. You cannot cure it retroactively. That line runs in one direction. Two more things that generate enforcement referrals. Finders. If someone is introducing investors and being paid based on whether the money closes, that person is very likely acting as an unregistered broker. The exposure attaches to the issuer as well, and it can give investors a rescission right. And Form D. You file it within fifteen days of the first sale. It is a short form. Failing to file it does not by itself destroy the federal exemption, but it is a marker, and markers accumulate. Nine years reading these files at the Commission taught me that Regulation D matters rarely begin with fraud. They begin with a solicitation that should not have happened, and an investor who lost money and went looking for a remedy. Get the flavor right before the first dollar moves. This is Inside Securities Law. I'm Frederick M. Lehrer. General information, not legal advice.

Listen
The Firm's Perspective

What Twenty-Five Years of Securities Practice

Actually Looks Like

"Most securities attorneys read the regulations. I spent nine years enforcing them. When I review a client's S-1 or Regulation D offering, I am not consulting a checklist — I am running the same analytical framework I used at the SEC's Southeast Regional Office to evaluate whether a filing would attract scrutiny, generate a comment letter, or escalate into a formal investigation."

— Frederick M. Lehrer, Former SEC Enforcement Attorney

The Enforcement Background That Changes the Advice

From 1991 through 2000, Frederick M. Lehrer served as an attorney in the Division of Enforcement at the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission's Southeast Regional Office. During those nine years, he participated in investigations involving insider trading, accounting fraud, market manipulation, misleading disclosures, and failures to file required reports under federal securities law. He was not a compliance officer reviewing policies — he was building cases.

From 1997 through 1999, he served concurrently as a Special Assistant United States Attorney in the Southern District of Florida, prosecuting securities-related financial crimes. That dual civil-and-criminal enforcement experience — understanding both how the SEC builds a civil enforcement action and how the DOJ constructs a criminal prosecution — is not something that can be acquired from a textbook or a continuing legal education seminar.

When that background is applied to private practice, the result is advisory work that is fundamentally different from what a securities attorney without enforcement experience can offer. The firm evaluates every disclosure, every registration statement, and every investor communication from the perspective of how the SEC staff would analyze it — because that is exactly how the firm's principal was trained to analyze documents.

Issuer-Side Representation: What the Practice Actually Covers

The firm's practice focuses on issuer-side representation. This means the firm represents companies — not investors, not regulators, not plaintiffs' class action counsel. The firm's clients are issuers preparing to access public capital markets, companies managing ongoing disclosure obligations under the Securities Act of 1933 and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and private companies conducting capital raises through exempt offerings under Regulation D.

Engagements typically involve preparing and reviewing SEC filings — Forms 10-K, 10-Q, and 8-K — drafting and revising registration statements such as Form S-1 and Form 10, advising on Regulation A offerings, and assisting companies conducting capital raises through Regulation D private placements. Many clients are companies preparing to go public or transitioning from private capital raising into public market reporting obligations.

Others are established reporting companies requiring ongoing securities counsel to review disclosures, evaluate investor communications, and address SEC comment letters. The firm also advises companies operating in industries subject to heightened regulatory scrutiny — cannabis and CBD companies navigating federal illegality disclosures, artificial intelligence companies describing rapidly evolving technologies to investors, and cryptocurrency or digital asset issuers evaluating whether a token or digital instrument may constitute a security under the Howey test.

On Disclosure Precision

Why Boilerplate Risk Factors Are No Longer Sufficient

In industries subject to heightened regulatory scrutiny, disclosure precision is critical. Boilerplate risk factors — the kind that say "we operate in a heavily regulated industry and changes in law could adversely affect our business" — are often insufficient when regulators expect detailed explanations of operational risk, legal uncertainty, and compliance frameworks.

A cannabis company that discloses federal illegality in a single generic paragraph is not adequately disclosing the specific operational risks that flow from that illegality — banking access, interstate commerce limitations, Schedule I classification implications for employees, and the risk that federal enforcement priorities could shift. An artificial intelligence company that describes its technology in aspirational terms without disclosing the specific risks of model failure, regulatory classification, or data privacy liability is creating exactly the kind of disclosure gap that generates SEC comment letters.

The firm's approach to disclosure review is shaped by enforcement experience. When reviewing registration statements, periodic reports, or investor communications, filings are evaluated from the perspective of how the SEC staff might analyze the document. This perspective allows potential disclosure deficiencies to be addressed before they become the subject of regulatory inquiries or comment letters — and long before they become the basis for an enforcement action.

1984 – 2000

U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Sixteen years at the Commission — first as an investigator, then nine years as an enforcement attorney in the Southeast Regional Office — working insider trading, accounting fraud, market manipulation, misleading disclosures, and reporting failures. Built cases. Evaluated filings. Understood how enforcement actions begin.

1997 – 1999

Special Assistant U.S. Attorney

Concurrent appointment in the Southern District of Florida prosecuting securities-related financial crimes. The dual civil-and-criminal enforcement perspective — understanding both how the SEC builds a civil action and how the DOJ constructs a criminal prosecution — is the foundation of the firm's risk analysis today.

2000 – Present

Private Practice

More than twenty-five years advising issuers worldwide on SEC registration, disclosure obligations, Regulation D private placements, Regulation A offerings, going public transactions, and ongoing reporting compliance. Flat-fee structure designed to remove the hesitation companies feel when seeking early legal guidance.

Flat-Fee Structure

Compliance Support Model

This firm utilizes a flat-fee structure for both ongoing compliance advisory and specific project-based engagements. This approach is designed to provide clients with predictable legal costs, allowing for a defined budgetary framework when managing regulatory requirements.

By utilizing a fixed-fee model, the firm aims to facilitate an environment where communication regarding securities guidance is frequent and proactive. This structure is intended to support the primary goal shared by both the firm and the client: the production of accurate, complete, and defensible disclosures.

Industries the Firm Regularly Advises

The firm's clients span a wide range of industries, including entertainment, sports, cannabis and CBD, artificial intelligence, real estate, hydration and consumer products, shipping, lending, telecommunications, animal nutrition, cryptocurrency and digital assets, gaming, and electric vehicles. What these industries share is not their business model — it is their need for securities counsel who understands how their specific operational characteristics translate into disclosure obligations, and how those disclosures will be evaluated by the SEC staff.

Cannabis & CBD
Artificial Intelligence
Cryptocurrency & Digital Assets
Electric Vehicles
Real Estate
Entertainment & Sports
Telecommunications
Financial Services

The firm is based in Florida and serves clients internationally. Consultations are confidential and available by phone, video, or in person.

Frequently Asked Questions

Common Questions About

Securities Law & Our Services

Ongoing securities work is handled under a monthly flat fee covering a defined scope: SEC periodic filings (10-K, 10-Q, 8-K, Form D), disclosure and press-release review, agreement review, and governance questions. Registration statements, private placement memoranda, and other large drafting projects are quoted separately on a flat-fee basis. No hourly billing, and the scope is set in writing before work begins.

Before entering private practice, Mr. Lehrer spent nine years as an enforcement attorney in the SEC's Division of Enforcement, investigating and prosecuting fraudulent schemes and other violations of federal securities laws. During three of those years he served concurrently as a Special Assistant United States Attorney in the Southern District of Florida.

Yes. Frederick M. Lehrer, Attorney and Counselor at Law, is a national and international law practice that focuses on securities and corporate law matters. He serves clients worldwide from his office in Clermont, Florida, handling cross-border offerings, foreign private issuers, and international compliance matters.

Frederick M. Lehrer offers comprehensive securities law services including SEC disclosure and reporting, SEC registration statements, going public matters, private placement memoranda, OTC market filings, proxy statements, insider reports, private exemptions, Blue Sky compliance, investor relations compliance, and Rule 506 compliance.

Frederick M. Lehrer assists companies in going public through multiple paths including traditional IPOs (Form S-1), Regulation A+ offerings, direct public offerings, reverse mergers, and OTC market listings. He handles all SEC filings, FINRA applications, and Blue Sky compliance from start to finish.

Frederick M. Lehrer offers flat-fee arrangements for most securities law services, providing transparent, predictable pricing. Clients pay a monthly flat fee for ongoing legal services, with registration statements and large document preparation also offered on a flat fee basis — making budgeting straightforward for startups and established companies alike.

Frederick M. Lehrer spent nine years as an enforcement attorney in the SEC's Division of Enforcement, where he investigated and prosecuted fraudulent schemes and violations of federal securities laws. During three of those years he served concurrently as a Special Assistant United States Attorney in the Southern District of Florida, giving him unique insight into how regulators think and act.

Have a question not listed here? Contact us for a free consultation.

Ask Frederick M. Lehrer
Email Fred Directly(561) 706-7646