How Going Public Affects Corporate Governance and Legal Obligations

Taking a company public is a significant step that transforms how it operates, particularly in terms of corporate governance and legal obligations. In Florida, as in other states, the shift from private to public status involves a series of legal, regulatory, and organizational changes that alter internal controls and external accountability.
Frederick M. Lehrer, Attorney & Counselor, serves clients in Clermont, Florida, with years of experience and a fundamental understanding of the intersection between going public and legal obligation. Corporate law plays a central role throughout this transition, dictating how boards function, how information is disclosed, and how shareholder rights are protected.
Corporate law governs how businesses are formed, operated, and dissolved. For private companies, especially those operating within Florida, legal requirements are often more flexible. Once a company goes public, however, it becomes subject to a stricter set of corporate law standards, particularly under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
These laws are supplemented by regulations from the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), the stock exchange where the company is listed, and Florida state statutes. In a public setting, corporate law mandates a higher level of transparency, consistent financial reporting, and regular communication with shareholders.
The board of directors, which may have operated informally in a private company, must now meet specific independence and oversight requirements. Public companies in Florida must also comply with both federal securities law and the Florida Business Corporation Act (FBCA), which governs the duties of directors and officers.
Corporate governance refers to the system of rules, practices, and processes by which a company is directed and controlled. Going public imposes several new expectations on governance. For example, the composition of the board changes significantly.
Public companies are generally required to have a majority of independent directors—individuals who aren’t involved in the daily operations of the business and have no material relationships with it. Florida-based public companies must meet these governance standards to remain in good standing with the SEC and maintain investor confidence.
Committees such as audit, compensation, and nominating committees become mandatory, and each must have a charter and follow defined procedures. These structures aren’t optional; they’re imposed by corporate law and stock exchange listing standards, such as those of NASDAQ or the NYSE.
One of the most notable changes following an initial public offering (IPO) is the requirement for full and timely disclosure. Public companies must file annual (10-K), quarterly (10-Q), and current (8-K) reports with the SEC.
These filings provide financial data, risk factors, management discussion and analysis (MD&A), and updates on significant corporate events. Corporate law compels public companies to disclose material information to prevent misinformation and protect shareholders.
For companies operating in Florida, compliance with these disclosure requirements can demand substantial internal adjustments. Systems for financial reporting, internal controls, and legal review need to be fortified. Legal counsel and accounting professionals often play an ongoing role in verifying that every disclosure aligns with corporate law mandates.
With greater visibility comes greater scrutiny. Going public places a company under the watchful eye of shareholders, analysts, regulators, and litigators. Public companies in Florida are more susceptible to class-action lawsuits, shareholder derivative suits, and SEC investigations than their private counterparts.
This heightened legal exposure stems directly from obligations imposed by corporate law and securities regulations. For example, if a public company misstates its financial condition or fails to disclose a significant risk, it could face allegations of securities fraud.
Directors and officers are personally accountable under various laws, including the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, which imposes criminal penalties for certain violations. These liabilities mean that Florida-based companies must adopt a disciplined approach to corporate governance and legal compliance.
When a company goes public, the responsibilities of its board members expand significantly. Corporate law dictates that directors have fiduciary duties to the corporation and its shareholders. These duties, namely the duty of care and the duty of loyalty, are interpreted more stringently for public companies.
The board must actively oversee financial performance, compliance matters, and risk management. Passive governance that might have sufficed for a private business becomes unacceptable. In Florida, directors must act in good faith and in a manner they reasonably believe to be in the best interests of the corporation.
Failure to meet these standards can result in personal liability. For this reason, board members are more cautious and deliberate in decision-making after a company goes public. They often demand detailed reports and conduct independent reviews before approving strategic initiatives or major financial disclosures.
In addition to federal requirements, companies in Florida must adhere to state-level regulations and corporate law provisions. Florida’s corporate statutes align with national standards but include some unique features.
For instance, Florida has statutes addressing shareholder rights, corporate indemnification, and derivative proceedings, which affect how companies handle internal disputes and protect their officers.
Going public brings attention to these state-level obligations. Companies need to establish policies that reflect Florida’s statutory rules, particularly concerning notice of shareholder meetings, voting procedures, and director elections.
Public companies are often required to update their bylaws to reflect these obligations accurately. Moreover, state securities regulators can impose additional disclosure or registration rules, especially during public offerings.
To comply with corporate law and SEC regulations, public companies must implement robust internal controls. These controls help prevent errors and fraud in financial reporting. The Sarbanes-Oxley Act requires management to assess internal controls annually and have an independent auditor verify them.
In Florida, many companies retain in-state accounting firms to assist with these audits and maintain local compliance. The audit committee of the board becomes instrumental in this process. It must consist entirely of independent directors and have at least one financial expert, according to SEC rules.
This committee oversees the audit process, communicates with external auditors, and reviews internal control procedures. Their role is vital in maintaining the integrity of financial reporting and fulfilling obligations under corporate law.
Going public expands the base of ownership and invites a more diverse group of shareholders. This new ownership structure introduces challenges related to shareholder rights and activism. Shareholders gain rights to vote on critical matters such as director elections, executive compensation, mergers, and significant asset sales.
These rights aren’t just procedural; they’re enforceable under corporate law. In Florida, shareholders also have the right to bring derivative suits if they believe that the board has breached its fiduciary duties.
The potential for such litigation motivates public companies to adopt transparent decision-making processes and maintain thorough records. Companies may also face shareholder proposals at annual meetings, pushing for policy changes, governance reforms, or environmental and social accountability.
Going public doesn't only change legal obligations; it affects how the company operates on a daily basis. The pressure to deliver consistent financial results can influence business strategy and internal culture. Management must balance short-term shareholder expectations with long-term objectives.
In Florida, where many public companies are relatively young or recently transitioned from private ownership, this shift can create operational challenges. These pressures are compounded by the legal requirement to disclose forward-looking risks and projections.
What management says during investor calls or in SEC filings can have legal consequences under corporate law. Statements that turn out to be inaccurate or overly optimistic may lead to allegations of misleading shareholders, resulting in regulatory or legal action.
Florida presents a specific set of legal obligations that overlay federal rules. Companies headquartered or incorporated in Florida must understand how state corporate law intersects with public company duties. Some important elements include:
Shareholder inspection rights under the Florida Business Corporation Act
Rules for calling special meetings and the use of written consents
Statutory procedures for mergers and asset sales
Director indemnification and liability limitations
Advance notice bylaws for shareholder proposals
Quorum and voting rules for shareholder meetings
Statutory appraisal rights in certain transactions
Requirements for maintaining corporate records
These requirements add an additional layer of responsibility for companies that have recently gone public or are considering doing so.
Once a company becomes public, there’s no return to the informal practices of its private past. Public status creates a lasting set of responsibilities governed by corporate law. Directors and officers are continuously subject to review by shareholders, regulators, and courts.
This scrutiny requires a structured governance model, continuous legal oversight, and ongoing board development. Companies in Florida must be particularly mindful of the interaction between state corporate statutes and federal securities law.
Even minor procedural errors can lead to regulatory penalties or shareholder dissatisfaction. As public companies mature, they often evolve their governance practices to accommodate changes in investor expectations, market conditions, and legal standards.
Going public transforms a company's legal and operational responsibilities. For Florida-based businesses considering the transition, it’s essential to approach the IPO process with a full appreciation of the corporate governance and legal obligations that follow. Located in Orlando, Florida, Attorney Lehrer serves clients across the Orlando and Central Florida area, as well as internationally. Turn to Frederick M. Lehrer, Attorney & Counselor, in Clermont, Florida, to learn more.