Strategies for Structuring a Smooth Going-Public Process
Taking a company public is a defining milestone that requires careful preparation, legal precision, and strong corporate strategy. From managing regulatory filings to maintaining investor confidence, the process involves multiple steps that must align seamlessly.
With experienced legal guidance, businesses can make sure their transition to a public entity is efficient and compliant.
At Frederick M. Lehrer, their Orlando going public lawyer helps companies throughout nearby communities work through every phase of the process with a disciplined approach grounded in securities law.
By developing tailored strategies and maintaining close coordination with management, accountants, and underwriters, the firm helps clients reduce risk, maintain compliance, and strengthen long-term investor relationships.
Every successful public offering begins with a solid foundation. Before drafting registration statements or engaging underwriters, companies must assess whether their structure, financial reporting, and governance practices meet public standards.
Preparation steps often include:
Corporate restructuring: Some businesses need to reorganize their ownership, subsidiaries, or internal operations to meet exchange requirements.
Financial readiness: Audited financial statements compliant with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) are essential. Companies must also prepare to make quarterly and annual filings.
Governance updates: Public companies must have a board of directors, committees, and bylaws that align with securities regulations and corporate governance standards.
Internal controls: Systems for tracking financial transactions and preventing fraud need to be well-established before filing.
By addressing these elements early, companies can reduce delays once the formal registration process begins. Each of these factors contributes directly to compliance under securities law and helps build investor trust.
There’s more than one way for a company to go public, and the right path depends on its goals, financial condition, and timeline. Each option carries unique legal and strategic implications under securities law.
Common routes include:
Initial Public Offering (IPO): The traditional method involving the sale of new shares to the public with the assistance of underwriters.
Direct Listing: Companies list existing shares directly on an exchange without issuing new stock, often to save on underwriting costs.
Reverse Merger: A private company merges with an existing public shell company, gaining public status more quickly.
While IPOs remain the most recognized route, direct listings and reverse mergers have become popular alternatives for businesses that value flexibility. The choice of structure affects disclosure obligations, pricing control, and shareholder composition. Working with an attorney skilled in securities law helps businesses evaluate which approach aligns with their objectives.
Transparency lies at the heart of all public offerings. The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) requires companies to disclose detailed financial and operational information to protect investors and maintain market integrity.
Developing a disclosure strategy involves balancing compliance with clarity. Investors should receive the information necessary to make informed decisions without unnecessary jargon or speculation. Key disclosure documents include:
Registration statement (Form S-1): This document provides a comprehensive overview of the company, including business operations, management details, and financial data.
Prospectus: Distributed to potential investors, it summarizes the company’s business model, risk factors, and the use of proceeds.
Periodic reports: Once public, companies must continue to file annual (Form 10-K), quarterly (Form 10-Q), and current (Form 8-K) reports.
A lawyer experienced in securities law helps clients maintain consistency and accuracy across all disclosures. This minimizes regulatory scrutiny and promotes investor confidence, both of which are critical for a successful public debut.
Compliance is one of the most challenging aspects of becoming a public company. Each stage of the process is governed by federal securities regulations, exchange listing requirements, and state “blue sky” laws.
Effective compliance strategies include:
Coordinating with auditors and underwriters: These professionals help verify financial disclosures and evaluate risk factors.
Maintaining continuous communication with the SEC: Clear responses to SEC comments or requests for clarification can speed up approval.
Implementing ongoing training: Corporate officers and directors should understand their obligations under securities law, including insider trading restrictions and reporting duties.
A company that prioritizes transparency and compliance early on is less likely to face enforcement actions or reputational harm. Legal guidance throughout this phase helps align corporate actions with evolving regulations and investor expectations.
Sound governance practices not only satisfy regulatory requirements but also attract investors seeking accountability and transparency. Establishing governance policies early signals that the company takes its fiduciary duties seriously.
Strong governance practices often include:
Independent directors: A majority of independent board members can improve oversight and reduce potential conflicts of interest.
Audit and compensation committees: These specialized groups oversee financial reporting and executive pay policies.
Ethical conduct policies: Codes of ethics and whistleblower protections foster trust among investors and employees.
Shareholder communication plans: Clear channels for investor relations help maintain credibility.
These elements reflect not only best practices but also compliance with key provisions of securities law. A well-governed company is more likely to attract institutional investors and achieve sustainable growth post-offering.
The process of going public involves collaboration among several professionals, including investment bankers, accountants, and valuation experts. A coordinated approach helps keep the process efficient and aligned with regulatory expectations.
Attorneys play an essential role in facilitating communication between these parties. They make sure that the registration statement, financial statements, and corporate documents all align with securities law standards. In addition, they assist with drafting underwriting agreements, reviewing due diligence materials, and managing investor communications.
Because these stakeholders operate within different but interconnected areas, consistent communication helps prevent errors and regulatory setbacks. A carefully managed relationship among advisors contributes to a smooth, timely offering.
Beyond legal and regulatory compliance, companies must think strategically about how the market will perceive their public offering. Investor sentiment, timing, and pricing all affect how shares perform after the initial launch.
Considerations include:
Timing the market: External factors such as economic stability and sector trends influence investor appetite.
Valuation alignment: Pricing shares appropriately helps maintain interest without undervaluing the business.
Marketing the offering: Investor roadshows, presentations, and digital outreach help create momentum leading up to the listing.
These elements extend beyond pure legal work but are closely tied to compliance and disclosure obligations under securities law. When companies balance business strategy with transparency, they set the stage for stronger long-term performance.
A company’s responsibilities don’t end once it’s listed on an exchange. Public entities must maintain continuous compliance with SEC reporting requirements and corporate governance standards.
Post-offering strategies often include:
Establishing an investor relations department: This helps manage communications and build shareholder loyalty.
Continuing legal compliance programs: Ongoing review of filings and disclosure materials reduces future regulatory risks.
Monitoring insider trading rules: Officers, directors, and major shareholders must adhere to reporting and trading restrictions under securities law.
Periodic board evaluations: Assessing governance effectiveness helps maintain accountability and transparency.
These ongoing measures demonstrate a commitment to corporate responsibility and compliance. A proactive legal approach can help prevent violations that might otherwise damage reputation or lead to enforcement actions.
While financial advisors and underwriters are vital to the going-public process, the foundation of a successful transition lies in effective legal planning. Securities law governs every stage of the offering—from preparing disclosures to maintaining post-listing compliance.
A well-structured legal strategy provides:
Clarity and consistency: Coordinated documentation reduces confusion and regulatory challenges.
Investor confidence: Transparent and timely disclosures strengthen credibility.
Risk mitigation: Proactive legal review prevents violations and litigation.
Efficiency: Organized preparation saves time and resources throughout the process.
By addressing potential issues early, companies can focus on growth and profitability rather than regulatory obstacles. Legal strategy doesn’t just support the going-public process—it shapes how the company performs as a public entity for years to come.
Transitioning from a private company to a publicly traded one is a major undertaking that demands precision and foresight. Attorney Frederick Lehrer offers legal guidance grounded in securities law to help businesses structure efficient, compliant, and successful offerings.
The firm serves clients in Orlando, Florida, and surrounding areas. Contact Frederick M. Lehrer today to discuss your company’s path toward going public and building long-term value for investors.